Latest updates


Several weeks ago, throngs of Americans in New York City and Washington, D.C., came together to celebrate the calculated assassination of a mass-murdering, self-proclaimed jihadist.

Immediately, the thought came to me that we are just like them: those in Afghanistan and Iraq, publicly exhibiting limbs and souvenir weapons of killed American soldiers; those in Iran and Pakistan, burning flags and presidential effigies in a collective fervor; and those ethnic citizens rallying outside of their respective countries’ American and British embassies, calling for an end to the war crimes being perpetrated by U.S. officials and forces.

For much of the time I have been occupied in following the war journeys on which we have embarked, I have often felt proud of the fact that U.S. citizens have seemingly embraced victory, albeit at great cost, through humility, and in the fleeting expectation that we have only acted with deadly force when no other options were available.

As these wars have dragged on, so many images have brought me to realize instead that we are just like them.

Was the killing of Bin Laden necessary and justified? Is the world safer in his absence than it was in his presence? These are rhetorical and simple questions. The real quandary that we, adults and adolescents, tucked safely away in this academic, impenetrable kingdom, face is this: Should we publicly celebrate the death of Osama bin Laden? Should we cheer “USA! USA! USA!” in the dining hall and open spaces? Should we pump our fists because we got him? Bring it further, and describe it as it is: Do we love to see our enemies suffer? The hard reality, it seems, is that we Americans, projected on that day to the world in the videos of the joyful chaos we demonstrated, take genuine joy in Bin Laden’s death.

Rather than be critical of that fact, let us accept it at face value and additionally ask this question: Is there any reason to resist the temptation to celebrate Bin Laden’s death? Down what road are we headed if Bin Laden’s death is such an intrinsic, patriotic aphrodisiac? Hey–that felt good! I gotta get me some more of that stuff! If killing him was important enough to hear a call for a national holiday honoring American pride, then are we not moving toward a nationalist position that is more carnal and less human? Let’s not forget that even Nazism had humble roots.

Most often, the sudden death of someone influential–-such as Princess Diana, President Kennedy, or Reverend King–- invites us to the realization of the magnitude of human potential that has been lost in death. The more recent joyful and public responses we saw in Bin Laden’s death flip the paradigm completely and seemingly present his death as something gained in our collective humanity. Ask your friend, your parents, or your god: Can anything be gained by annihilating human life?

Take care not to answer this question quickly: situational ethics are always biased. If the destruction of life results in our personal joy, we need to be wary of what lies ahead for us on our social and spiritual horizon, especially when we recognize that our own country’s weapons of mass destruction are but an impulsive moment away from launch. We need to be wary to not become like them.

It is both critical and natural to fear our descent in this regard; if Bin Laden’s life meant nothing to us, and further yet his death meant everything, then we should make sure to tread with caution in our newfound roles of judge and executioner. In this regard, humility and self-reflection should prevail, lest the thrill of the sound of our gavel and the swing of our axe emerge as actions that give happiness, sustenance… and a desire for more.

Jan Flaska is the assistant Dean of Students and the Dean of Spiritual and Ethical Life. Congratulations to his family on the birth of Emma Day!

5 Comments on USA! USA! USA?

  1. Deerfield Alum // June 1, 2011 at 2:33 pm //

    We did not burn Afghan flags, we did not call for the death of the Afghan people.

    We celebrated the end of a man that has already severely impacted us. The younger college generation does not have many memories pre 9/11. Most of the world we know is a post 9/11 and we certainly don’t like it. We don’t like to see photos of dead American and Afghan men and women in the middle east. We want to rid the world of the terrible concept of radical terrorism and we celebrated because we felt we accomplished a huge goal in this mission.

    Remember they did find a great deal of information in his compound and it is fairly clear he remained actively involved in the terrorist organization.


    • I agree that it is important to acknowledge the benefits of Bin Laden’s death… we know have leads towards significantly weakening a terrorist organization. Let that be our cause to feel good. It is a humbling and sad reminder that to combat killing and to keep people safe, we too must continue the vicious circle… it is the ultimate, seemingly necessary tragedy of war. Celebration only breeds disunity. It emphasizes that there is one side against the other. This is an unhealthy mindset particularly when facing an enemy without borders– the idea of terrorism. It is a simple idea based on terror, nothing else. Through celebrating killing we justify a consistent tool of terror as a legitimate way to “win.” Terrorists have their own ideals and beliefs cemented into their mind. Killing others is their definition of “winning.” Perhaps we are not so different from them, as Mr. Flaska suggests.

  2. EM (Deerfield Student) // June 15, 2011 at 4:03 pm //

    As a student, I was somewhat disturbed by the chants and celebrations I witnessed in the dining hall, at school meeting, and online. I am always opposed to ending a human life, though I understand the situational rationale behind the choice. It is more the public reaction that upset me. In the dorm and at school, I also felt as though I would have been ridiculed as un-American for being outwardly uncomfortable with celebrating Bin Laden’s death. I am happy that there is someone on campus, especially a dean, who has brought to light this point-of-view. Thank you Mr. Flaska.

  3. Jan Flaska...King of the False Equivalence // June 16, 2011 at 4:59 pm //

    Pretty vintage Flaska here. False equivalence abounds. He’s a well-intentioned guy; but his analysis is usually shallow. He’s a spiritual leader type, not an intellectual. So perhaps it isn’t fair to expect much from him in the intellectual arena.

  4. That a faculty member should parade such tripe in front of the school community is truly an embarassment to the school. Millions of people around the world celebrated Osama’s death not as a celebration of his individual death but as a strike against what he represented: terrorism. None of the celebrants knew Osama personally, they just knew what he stood for and promoted– and they did not like it. That Mr. F fails to grasp this point is alarming. His risible piece devolves even further. Comparing Princess Diana to Martin Luther King and JFK, and a proposed holiday honoring national pride to nazism makes me concerned for students of a teacher so deficient in a capacity for discernment.

    Hubris and ignorance fueled by a smug sense of moral superiority, such as Mr. F exhibits in this piece, was at the root of nazism. Would any Deerfield student dare submit such a fundamentally flawed and intellectually lazy piece of work for one of their courses? Nobody I know here would.

Comments are closed.